Home > Leadership, Random Rants, The Monday Musings Column > instant communication does not imply good communication

instant communication does not imply good communication

Communication has been on my mind this week and I have been reflecting on the way that it has changed so much in the last twenty years or so. The vehicle for that change has been technology and it has affected verbal and written communication by giving us an opportunity to interact in different ways, the most striking of which, perhaps, is in the immediacy with which we can reach others.

Whilst Telex had been around for a while it was email that was the first big change and the ability to write and transmit a letter over a telephone line to another computer using a portable device was something of a revelation. Yes the first portable terminals did weight about 10 kg and looked like a typewriter, and there were some limitations, mainly because it was a closed loop system, but that was a big move forward in written communication and the arrival of the internet shortly afterwards allowed email use to explode. With the benefit the failures were exposed though; it is immediate in the sense that you send and whilst it may arrive almost immediately at the other end it may not be seen for hours or longer, but there came an assumption that sending implied receipt and that responsibility had passed at that point.

Standards also began to decline, for when you had your correspondence typed by a professional they would provide a sense check and were also guardians of corporate standards regarding grammar, spelling and, to some degree, content. The advent of email saw not just the demise of the typing pool, but of quality.

email also changed human interaction for people in the same building, even in the same room, began to email each other instead of talking. I can remember one accountant enthusing about how much time this was saving by keeping people at their desk overlooking the time it was taking to type instead of talk let alone the loss of personal interaction.

The mobile phone had been around in car ‘phone terms for a while for a few people with deep pockets before it began to become a little more portable in the mid-eighties.  From business tool to everyone’s essential took a little while as did the move from weight training device to candy bar sized, but all of a sudden instant communication had become a reality and basic courtesy vanished. People could interrupt you whenever and wherever and from anywhere and they would, not just because they could, but because they thought that they needed to, and in the same way that people had begun to email you from a few feet away they would now ‘phone you, even when they could see you.

Text messaging came on the back if the mobile ‘phone and evolved its own form of shorthand that allowed faster exchanges, but at least there is some discretion in text due to it not involving any vocal input. Telephone conversations are often either totally inane or incredibly indiscreet, ranging from the flurry of “I’m on the 9.15 as usual, see you in about 40 minutes” (is this a hint to get the lover out?) to the “Well we had the meeting, but what a bunch of plonkers” where the caller will often reveal the name of the company as they brief their colleague on the inadequacies of the other party and demonstrate their own superiority in outsmarting the hapless opposition.

Easy communication is not good communication nor is it efficient and we should learn how to use the new tools in better ways. Communication is two-way for a start, so some consideration of the other party’s ability to listen and respond would be a good starting point. Next would be some thought about who you are communicating to, for talking loudly on your ‘phone in a public place means that you have an audience of twenty or thirty people who do not want to hear what you have to say and you really should not want them to hear it either. Finally consider the problem that, oral or written, instant communication is just that; once the words have left they will be received, and all too often the words that you have used may have benefitted from some thought before they were uttered or sent.

 

Advertisements
  1. May 19, 2014 at 6:07 am

    Reblogged this on Money Making Ideas.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: